‘Who you with?’

by | Jan 13, 2021 | Archive, Miscellaneous

For me, it was among the most terrifying images from a day filled with terror:

The video, taken from the gallery of the United States Senate, shows some of the people who had brazenly and illegally stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 on the floor of the Senate, As the person taking the video approaches the edge of the gallery, you can see another person perched in a gallery seat; that person also appears to be videoing the rioters below. Then you hear a voice — it’s not clear who’s speaking — say this:

“Who you with?”

This came from the Twitter account of Frank Thorp V, a producer for NBC News, so I think it’s a good bet that Thorp took this video.

It took me a couple of times through the video to hear the answer to that question — “Who you with? — but it’s worth a moment now to think about why the question is particularly chilling.

Earlier in the day, the protesters had made no bones about their distaste for journalists: A photographer for the Associated Press was shoved around and punched. Other journalists watched as their equipment was manhandled and damaged. The words “Murder the Media” were scrawled on an interior doorway of the Capitol.

None of this is a surprise in a political climate in which the president of the United States consistently has labeled journalists “enemies of the people.” (Of course, this is not just an issue in the United States: The organization Reporters Without Borders says that 50 journalists worldwide were killed in connection with their work in 2020.)

So my point is this: In this type of national environment — and in the midst of a riot — the question “Who you with?” can be a dangerous one. It’s not hard to imagine how certain answers could lead to trouble.

In this case, as it turned out, the answer (also from someone off-camera) was this: “Getty; I’m with Getty.” (Getty Images is a British-American visual media company; whoever answered presumably was working for that organization.) Peace was maintained in the gallery of the U.S. Senate — as opposed to the mayhem on the floor.

Of course, there’s a broader perspective to the question, and that’s worth thinking about as well. It’s not so much about choosing sides but, rather, deciding what you stand for and how you’re willing to work for those principles. What’s important to you? Why?

Who you with?

0 Comments

Want your art event listed?

Read more published work

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Recent Blog Posts

Your Weekend Reader for March 22-23

Your Weekend Reader for March 22-23

A baby elephant. A stomach bug. The Trump administration. Budget uncertainty. Millionaire migration. The end of the universe. Conan O’Brien. Health tips on social media. Did I mention the baby elephant? It’s all in the spring break edition of Your Weekend Reader.

read more
Your Weekend Reader for March 15-16

Your Weekend Reader for March 15-16

Scott Rueck and OSU basketball. The fight to undermine an important court ruling. Why invading Canada is a bad idea. The blood moon. A godless city within driving distance. News about dogs and cats. It’s all in the (somewhat late) Weekend Reader.

read more
Your Weekend Reader for March 8-9

Your Weekend Reader for March 8-9

The silence around Trump. More on the Post — and more about the James Bond deal (they’re kind of related). Middle housing in Oregon. Kosher salt. A lunar eclipse looms. Daylight time. Make your phone boring. And the soccer game with the “no murder” rule. It’s all in the new edition of Your Weekend Reader.

read more
Your Weekend Reader for March 1-2

Your Weekend Reader for March 1-2

Please submit your bullet points about last week’s work. Also, “When Trump Met Zelenskyy.” Billionaires and newspapers. The Washington Post. “When Bond Met Bezos.” Bad news for a Portland park. Nutria: It’s what’s for dinner. Gene Hackman’s essential films. And the Oscar contest. It’s all in the new Weekend Reader.

read more

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of any other agency, organization, employer, or company.

Comments on this website are the sole responsiblity of their writers and the writers will take full responsiblity, liability and blame for any libel or litigation that results from something written in or as a direct result of something written in a comment.

We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason whatsoever.

More Blog Posts

Your Weekend Reader for March 22-23

A baby elephant. A stomach bug. The Trump administration. Budget uncertainty. Millionaire migration. The end of the universe. Conan O’Brien. Health tips on social media. Did I mention the baby elephant? It’s all in the spring break edition of Your Weekend Reader.

read more

Your Weekend Reader for March 15-16

Scott Rueck and OSU basketball. The fight to undermine an important court ruling. Why invading Canada is a bad idea. The blood moon. A godless city within driving distance. News about dogs and cats. It’s all in the (somewhat late) Weekend Reader.

read more

Your Weekend Reader for March 8-9

The silence around Trump. More on the Post — and more about the James Bond deal (they’re kind of related). Middle housing in Oregon. Kosher salt. A lunar eclipse looms. Daylight time. Make your phone boring. And the soccer game with the “no murder” rule. It’s all in the new edition of Your Weekend Reader.

read more