Your Weekend Reader for Jan. 8-9

by | Jan 8, 2022 | Journalism, Miscellaneous | 2 comments

Let’s try something different with this edition of Your Weekend Reader: Instead of leading this week with stories about the grave dangers facing American democracy (not that those are going away), how about if we start with a handful of pieces that offer a glimmer of optimism? Then we can dive back into the state of our imperiled democracy. Ready? Let’s go.

Henry Fountain of The New York Times, who reported on last summer’s massive Bootleg fire in southern Oregon, recently returned to the scene of the fire and came away with an intriguing — and encouraging — finding: “Thinning of trees in overgrown forests, combined with prescribed, or controlled, burns of accumulated dead vegetation on the forest floor, can help achieve the goal of reducing the intensity of wildfires by removing much of the fuel that feeds them.” Researchers also are increasingly reaching out to Native American tribes, which have long experience at using wildfire to manage forests. The story quotes, among others, James Johnston, a researcher at Oregon State University, a proponent of thinning and prescribed fires. But not everyone is convinced, and Fountain talks to some of those folks as well.

Here’s a piece that ran in the New York Times Magazine at the end of 2021 that I missed, but it’s still worth your time: It’s an interview with Katharine Hayhoe, an evangelical Christian and a climate scientist — and if you think the two are mutually exclusive, Dr. Hayhoe would like a word with you. This should help to somewhat ease the despair you feel about climate change.

Continuing with our string of uncharacteristically optimistic selections, here’s a short piece from The Atlantic’s Derek Thompson, listing three reasons why he’s optimistic about the 2020s — despite all the evidence the decade has presented thus far. This is part of The Atlantic’s new batch of newsletters.

Are you struggling already with your set of resolutions for the new year? Relax: The Atlantic’s Amanda Mull is here to help, with an article that seeks to explain why some people find it easy to form new habits — and why the rest of us shouldn’t necessarily despair about that. (This piece also quotes the director of the University of Southern California Habit Lab, which sounds like a place I’d like to visit.)

That’s probably enough optimism for this week. Let’s get back to the peril facing U.S. democracy.

On his Fox News show Thursday night — yes, the anniversary of the Jan. 6, 2020 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol — Tucker Carlson told his viewers: “Jan. 6 barely rates as a footnote. Really not a lot happened that day if you think about it.” It was the latest example of how falsehoods and prevarications continue to cloud the truth of what happened on that dark day. The New York Times has a provocative piece exploring this latest big lie that threatens U.S. democracy.

I was happy to see the Gazette-Times devote an entire page to a transcript of President Biden’s powerful speech about the Jan. 6 riot — kudos to the Lee Enterprises national desk, based in Madison, Wisconsin, for pulling that together. If you missed that, the Times ran a transcript of the speech, with annotations from White House reporter Katie Rogers.

Let’s turn now to Oregon politics. The race to be elected Oregon’s next governor generated some big news this week. As you probably know, Secretary of State Shemia Fagan’s office announced that Nick Kristof, the former New York Times columnist, didn’t meet the state’s residency requirements and therefore could not run for the governor’s job. As expected, Kristof on Friday appealed the ruling straight to the Oregon Supreme Court. Now, you could look at this in a couple of ways: You could say that it smacks of Democrats like Fagan closing ranks to protect political colleagues from Kristof’s well-funded outsider electoral bid. But it was disappointing that Kristof, a two-time Pulitzer winner, rebuffed requests from journalists to release the documents on which he built his case for residency. Julia Shumway, of the increasingly essential Oregon Capital Chronicle, has the details about that. And here’s Jack Shafer of Politico weighing in against residency requirements — although, as he makes clear, he’s no fan of Kristof.

Meanwhile, as you may have noticed, Tina Kotek, speaker of the Oregon House, has announced her resignation from the Legislature. Her last day will be Jan. 21 — before the Legislature’s February session. Kotek said she was resigning now to focus on her gubernatorial campaign; under House rules, she wouldn’t be able to raise campaign money while serving in the Legislature. With Kristof on the sidelines (at least for the time being), Kotek and Oregon State Treasurer Tobias Read are the Democratic front-runners, but Kristof has raised significantly more cash than either Kotek or Read, according to Alex Baumhardt, writing for the Oregon Capital Chronicle.

The big wild card in the race is the campaign by Betsy Johnson, the longtime Democratic legislator who’s running as an unaffiliated candidate. At the time of this November story from OPB, Johnson already had raised more than $2 million — and doesn’t need to worry about a bruising primary campaign.

On the Republican side, 11 candidates (thus far) are seeking their party’s nomination in the May 17 primary. And candidates still have until March 8 to file, although if you’re not in thick of things now raising money, as Kotek’s resignation suggests, late filers will have some catching up to do.

Finally this week: The Eugene Weekly is continuing a worthwhile effort it began in 2021: Writing full obituaries for every houseless person who died in Lane County in 2021. Bob Keefer of the Weekly explains how the effort began. I’m going to think about we can get something like that going for Benton County. If you have ideas about this, send me a note or leave a comment below.

As always, if you’re looking for arts-and-entertainment ideas for the weekend or beyond, I have you covered: Check out my frequently updated curated (and opinionated) calendar of arts events.

See you next weekend.

Looking for something to do in the mid-valley? Check out my curated calendar of arts-and-entertainment events.

2 Comments

  1. Jack Compere

    Thanks for the always interesting cites of reading material – re homelessness, a subject which has the ability to drive me nuts due to its irresolvability, here’s a ‘toon: https://jackcompere.medium.com/slow-disaster-de18af844c12
    We’ve given a ton of… or lots anyway… $ to local groups to help address the situation, but I think at root this should be dealt w/in an overall national way, and good luck with that. Central to the problem is that no place wants to be a “draw” to the homeless (by treating them “too well”) yet every place wants to address the problem. Here’s something I wrote to local housing folk back in ’19: About the Homeless – A Corvallis Model

    Assertions/Assumptions

    1. One opinion faction believes that if a town is “too homeless-friendly” this will attract more homeless (and thus relieve the pressure on other towns).
    2. One opinion faction believes in helping the homeless to at least a minimum shelter, and the “factions” 1 and 2 aren’t mutually exclusive – that is, one person could hold both beliefs.
    3. There is a certain percentage of the population of towns our size that is and will likely remain homeless for the foreseeable future, and that percentage can be reliably determined perhaps periodically.
    4. Funds to deal with the homeless are limited.
    5. The existing ad hoc manner of addressing the problem is unsatisfactory to most.

    Discussion

    If “factions” 1 and 2 could be satisfied that a new method incorporated both beliefs to the degree possible there might be a reasonable path forward and away from the ad hoc methods. The new method (or “model”) would necessarily not totally satisfy everyone because it must provide at least a minimum shelter but avoid being a “magnet” for other towns’ homeless – thus the model must have elements that are both, put briefly, “carrot” and “stick.”

    The model and tax to support it must be approved by the voters, the model should be vetted with a legal/feasibility analysis.

    The “Carrot”

    The “minimum shelter” should be specified in detail, but at a minimum must provide access to local transportation and assistance groups, and each living module within the shelter must provide electrical outlets and USB port, and space for single or couple occupancy. Some modules should be for families. There should be, inherent in the design of the shelter for those being accommodated, an encouragement/casework to progress to proper housing.

    To realistically address the homeless there should be no requirement that occupants are drug- or alcohol-free. If an occupant breaks a law existing police and judicial procedures will address the problem.

    The shelter should be sized to accommodate the homeless of this town and a small percentage to account for growth in the average homeless population for towns of our size. The (fairly) recent League of Women Voters report “Homelessness in Corvallis” indicate some preliminary totals of homeless in this city.

    The “Stick”

    Homeless who choose to not be part of the above solution should have some form of discouragement regarding the desirability of remaining in this town. The town, having gone to the expense/trouble of being demonstrably accommodating in its share of the homeless problem cannot take away funds from already-accommodated parties to address these “extra” parties.

    The design of the “discouragement” on the “extra” parties should be based on an understanding of what an average city of our size provides the homeless, and we should provide noticeably less.

    More discussion, this time with the jail thrown in

    Corvallis faces well-known problems with its old county jail. Optimum would be a funding proposal, working with the County, on the ballot for a new jail that also has space for the shelter, to be staffed by service groups (not the government), portrayed to the public as addressing two notable problems at once.

    Complete or partial rebuilding of the current jail, expanded in height, would be ideal in terms of access to services, but would require financial evaluation compared to other alternatives. This location, collocated with the jail, would also to some extent get around the current problem of finding a willing landlord for the homeless property.

    As a final word, it should be said that the offices of the police and sheriff departments stand to benefit if a solution (even partial) can be found to the homeless problem, because to some extent their burdens would be eased somewhat by not having to deal with the homeless to the degree they do today.

    Conclusion

    There is a case to be made that the current ad hoc addressing of the homeless situation is morally insupportable – not that it’s immoral, but rather that a citizen cannot be certain that enough is being done, and cannot likewise be certain that too much is being done. This gap in certainty allows the populace to fill that gap with resentments/suspicions/assumptions that are unhealthy for the political climate in a city. With a more fleshed-out version of the above model citizens can be put on a more firm footing – there will always be disagreement with any plan, but at least some clarity will have been reached.

    Reply
  2. Helen Higgins

    Love these updates Mike, so appreciate you sharing your writing talents with us and keeping us informed with a serving of humor on the side!

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Read more published work

Want your art event listed?

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Recent Blog Posts

Your Weekend Reader for Aug. 13-14

Your Weekend Reader for Aug. 13-14

A deep (and enraging) dive into immigration policy. Gerrymandering in statehouses. Liz Cheney. The Inflation Reduction Act. Climate change and outdoor theaters. The power of storytelling. Local journalism. Voting (again) on psilocybin. All this and more in the new edition of Your Weekend Reader.

read more
Your Weekend Reader for Aug. 6-7

Your Weekend Reader for Aug. 6-7

Weird vibes in the economy. Oregon politics and highways. Meteors in the night sky. Press freedom and abortion. Honoring Vin Scully. Pickles are hot. Why doing nothing is so hard. All this and more in the new edition of Your Weekend Reader.

read more

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of any other agency, organization, employer, or company.

Comments on this website are the sole responsiblity of their writers and the writers will take full responsiblity, liability and blame for any libel or litigation that results from something written in or as a direct result of something written in a comment.

We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason whatsoever.

More Blog Posts

Your Weekend Reader for Aug. 13-14

A deep (and enraging) dive into immigration policy. Gerrymandering in statehouses. Liz Cheney. The Inflation Reduction Act. Climate change and outdoor theaters. The power of storytelling. Local journalism. Voting (again) on psilocybin. All this and more in the new edition of Your Weekend Reader.

read more